Kemp, Dickens say World Cup matches will stay in Atlanta despite Trump remarks
Comments from President Donald Trump are raising questions about whether the possibility of changing host cities for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, even as planning is well underway. Gov. Brian Kemp’s office responded quickly, saying the matches aren’t moving. Economics professor Tom Smith of Emory University said relocating games would be unprecedented and nearly impossible.
ATLANTA – Recent remarks from former President Donald Trump have ignited a debate over the future of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, specifically questioning if host cities might be changed before the tournament, set to be hosted across multiple American cities.
World Cup Safety Debate
To unpack the situation:
Trump hinted at possible alterations to venue locations, stating, “It will be safe for the World Cup. If I think it isn’t safe, we’ll move it into a different city. Absolutely.” While he didn’t directly name Atlanta in his comments, the city, known for being a Democratic stronghold, has faced criticism from him in the past regarding urban safety. Atlanta is currently one of 11 U.S. host cities slated for matches.
Although a White House spokesperson refrained from confirming whether Atlanta specifically was on the potential relocation list, they emphasized that the tournament is projected to be “the safest World Cup ever.” This presents a substantial commitment to maintaining safety not only for attendees but for the cities hosting the events.
Georgia Leaders Respond
What are local leaders saying in response?
Governor Brian Kemp’s office quickly countered claims of moving the matches, asserting that plans and safety protocols have been in place for almost two years. “State, local and federal officials have been coordinating,” stated a Kemp spokesperson, emphasizing the collective effort to ensure a successful tournament.
Atlanta Mayor Andre Dickens echoed these sentiments, citing falling crime rates in the city. According to Atlanta’s police statistics, homicides are down by 26 percent thus far this year, affirming that public safety continues to be a priority for city leaders.
Is Moving the World Cup Plausible?
Why should you care about this situation?
Emory University economics professor Tom Smith weighed in, asserting that relocating World Cup games would be an extraordinary and near-impossible task. “That would be a Herculean task, as they might say. These cities signed memorandums of understanding years ago to make sure processes were in place,” he explained, pointing to the extensive planning already underway.
In terms of financial implications, Smith warned that Atlanta stands to gain significantly from the influx of fans and participants, potentially generating tens of millions of dollars. “There’s a robust fan base that’s coming from outside of Georgia depositing money. This is crucial for the economic landscape,” he emphasized.
Moreover, Smith clarified that FIFA’s agreements are primarily with the host cities rather than the federal government, which may reduce the influence of political remarks. However, Trump’s historical relationship with FIFA leadership could still hold some sway.
“FIFA is focused on hosting an excellent tournament, and they want cities that are well-prepared for these monumental games,” Smith reasoned.
FIFA on Host Cities
What is FIFA’s official stance?
FOX 5 reached out to FIFA as well as the Atlanta World Cup Host Committee to gather their perspectives on the president’s remarks, but as of this moment, neither has provided clarification or comment.
The Source: Information in this article came from FOX 5’s Rob DiRienzo speaking with Tom Smith of Emory University and past FOX 5 reporting.
