FIFA Advisor Cordeiro Resigns, Criticizing Controversial $20 Billion World Cup Stake Sale
A significant shake-up within FIFA occurred on Friday when Carlos Cordeiro, a senior adviser to FIFA President Gianni Infantino, announced his resignation in protest of plans to sell a stake in the World Cup. This decision comes amid growing opposition from European football associations, which have threatened to boycott FIFA events, and regional confederations that have united against the controversial proposal.
Cordeiro’s Resignation and Critique
Cordeiro’s resignation took effect immediately, as he labeled the proposed sale a “bad deal for football.” Appointed by Infantino in 2021 to help guide FIFA’s strategic direction, Cordeiro expressed concerns that the organization was “mortgaging football’s future without any compelling justification.” He emphasized that the proposal would adversely affect FIFA’s Member Associations and the long-term sustainability of the sport.
A former banker and ex-vice president of the U.S. Soccer Federation, Cordeiro clarified that he had no role in the proposal and opposed it “unequivocally.” His departure signals a fracture within FIFA’s leadership regarding the direction of the organization.
FIFA’s Response to Opposition
Despite the backlash, FIFA, headquartered in Switzerland, stated that “incorrect media reports” had disrupted its planned consultation process. The organization affirmed its commitment to moving forward with the proposal, which it intends to present to its 211 national football associations. FIFA emphasized the importance of allowing each Member Association (MA) to express its vote based on factual information.
The proposal involves the establishment of a $20 billion subsidiary, FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE), which would manage the World Cup and other events. FIFA plans to offer up to a 20% stake to external investors, with Thrive Eternal, a fund led by Thrive Capital’s Joshua Kushner, expected to spearhead the investment group.
Growing Opposition from UEFA and Other Confederations
The European football governing body, UEFA, has emerged as a leading voice against the proposal, accusing FIFA of commodifying the sport’s “soul.” On Thursday, UEFA’s 55 member nations unanimously voted to boycott all FIFA tournaments, a decision made shortly after Spain’s victory in the World Cup.
FIFA’s next major event is the women’s Under-20 World Cup scheduled for September. Polish officials, who are set to host the tournament, reported that they had not received any notifications regarding potential withdrawals from participating teams.
In response to the backlash, FIFA asserted, “Nobody is selling football. This is not something FIFA would ever entertain.” The organization maintained that while opposition is welcome, no single entity can claim to represent all 211 MAs globally.
Regional Reactions and Implications
The Confederation of North, Central America and Caribbean Association Football (CONCACAF) rejected the proposal during a meeting on Thursday but stopped short of issuing a boycott threat. Meanwhile, the Asian Football Confederation (AFC), which comprises 47 members, expressed solidarity with UEFA and CONCACAF but also refrained from threatening a boycott.
Stuart Dykes, the director of European and Institutional Affairs at Football Supporters Europe, criticized the decision-making process, asserting that such significant choices should not be made by a small group behind closed doors. He emphasized that football is a social good, created by fans and players, and should not be exploited for private investors’ gain.
FIFA’s Democratic Process Claim
Infantino communicated to all member associations that they would receive $40 million each if they supported FIFA’s proposal by September 19. On Friday, FIFA reiterated that it would not proceed with the plan without the backing of a majority of its member associations.
FIFA outlined that the principles of the FFE proposal include unprecedented development funding, global ownership of commercial opportunities, and self-determination through a democratic process for all MAs. Collectively, UEFA, CONCACAF, and the AFC represent 143 associations, significantly more than half of FIFA’s total membership.
However, individual member nations may not align with their federations’ positions. Czech Football Association President David Trunda acknowledged the potential “positive impact of FIFA’s intentions,” while the Mexican Football Federation indicated it would evaluate the proposal before making a decision, despite CONCACAF’s rejection.
As the debate surrounding the proposal continues, Danish brewers Carlsberg, who have a sponsorship deal with UEFA, took to social media to mock Infantino, referencing the mandatory hydration breaks introduced at the recent World Cup, which critics have labeled as a means for additional advertising opportunities.
For further details, refer to the source: www.arnnewscentre.ae.
Read all the latest developments and breaking updates in the Latest News section.
Published on 2026-07-31 20:58:00 • By the Editorial Desk
